The Effect of the Missouri Mathematics Project Learning Model on Students' Mathematical Communication Ability
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mathematical communication is one of the most important mathematical abilities that students must learn. Students' ability to communicate mathematical concepts orally or in writing is known as mathematical communication ability. Therefore, this research aims to determine how the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) model affects students' mathematical communication ability. With the Nonequivalent Control Group Design, The quantitative research method and type used in this research is experimental. Purposive sampling is a technique used for sampling which is an experimental class of the control class The research instrument used was a test. The data analysis in this study used parametric tests. The results of this research show that the class. is an experimental class that has a higher value when juxtaposed with the class analysed with descriptive analysis. The results of the hypothesis were obtained based on the t-test that it was significant. Thus, it is rejected and accepted, it is proven that the influence of the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) model on students' mathematical communication ability is obtained.
Article Details
References
Amin, M. S. (2018). Differences in Brain Structure and Learning Behavior Between Men and Women; Explanatory in the Perspective of Neuro Science and Philosophy. Journal of Indonesia Philosophy, 1(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i1.13973
Apriyani, Y. (2023). The Effect of the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) Learning Model on the Mathematical Communication Ability of Yeni Apriyani Students of the Mathematics and Natural Sciences Study Program, Indraprasta University PGRI Jakarta. 1, 359–368.
Ariawan, R., & Nufus, H. (2017). 231-Article. The Relationship between Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Students' Mathematical Communication Ability, 1(2), 82–91.
Astiswijaya, N. (2020). Improving Students' Mathematical Communication Skills with the Implementation of the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) Learning Model. Journal of Mathematics Education (Judika Education), 3(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v3i1.1179
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2020). Communicating mathematical ideas effectively: Conceptualizing communication competency in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09957-2
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1–2), 113–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6
Evitts, T. A. (2004). Communicating mathematically: Comparison of knowledge structures in communication. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 479–511.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Springer.
Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2017). Teaching secondary school mathematics: Research and practice for the 21st century. Allen & Unwin.
Hasnunidah, N. (2017). Research Methods. Academic Media, 117.
Hendriana, H., & Kadarisma, G. (2019). Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Communication Ability of Junior High School Students. JNPM (National Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.2033
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Ismah, I., & Sundi, V. H. (2018). Application of the Discovery Learning Model to Improve Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Grade VII Students of Junior High School Labschool Fip Umj. FIBONACCI: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.4.2.161-169
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2018). Cooperation in the classroom (9th ed.). Interaction Book Company.
Jazuli, A. (2009). Think creatively in mathematical communication skills. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 209–220. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/7025/1/P11-Akhmad Jazuli.pdf
Keitel, C. (1998). Social justice and mathematics education gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. ZDM The International Journal for Mathematics Education, 33(6), 187–191.
Khasinah, S. (2021). Discovery Learning: Definition, Syntax, Advantages and Disadvantages. Journal of MUDARRISUNA: Media Studi Agama Agama Islam, 11(3), 402. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v11i3.5821
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Leong, Y. H., & Tan, K. C. (2016). Mathematical reasoning: Its role in understanding and solving problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(7), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1159936
Maryati, I., & Priatna, N. (2018). Integration of Mathematical Character Values through Contextual Learning. Mosharafa: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i3.322
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse to motivate students. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25.
Nofrianto, A., Maryuni, N., & Amri, M. A. (2017). Students' mathematical communication: the influence of a realistic mathematical approach. Gantang Journal, 2(2), 113–121.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (Eds.). (2019). Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13738-1
Polly, D., & Orrill, C. H. (2012). Supporting mathematical communication through technology in elementary classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(3), 170–177.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
Rosyid, A., & Umbara, U. (2018). Implementation of the Missouri Mathematics Project Learning Model Assisted by GeoGebra to Improve Mathematical Communication Skills of Junior High School Students. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 2(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v2i2.1326
Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C., & Clarke, S. N. (Eds.). (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Camacho-Machín, M. (2014). Emerging approaches in the teaching of problem solving. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46(5), 701–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0632-2
Setyawan Putra, S., Fitriyani, H., & Uad, F. (n.d.). National Seminar on Education, Science and Technology of Mathematics Learning with the Missouri Mathematics Project Model to Improve the Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students. 312-319.
Suryati, K., & Putri, N. W. S. (2023). Application of the Missouri Mathematics Project Model to Mathematics Learning Outcomes. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.217-223
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Learning from mathematical communication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 13–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014097416157
Swan, M., & Burkhardt, H. (2014). Design research in mathematics education. Educational Designer, 2(7), 1–22.
Tinda, E. M., Wahyuni, R., & Mandasari, N. (2019). The Influence of the Missouri Mathematics Project Learning Model on Students' Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Mathematics Science and Education, 2(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.31540/jmse.v2i1.581
Ulfa Hs, A. (2019). The Effect of the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) Learning Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Grade VII Students of SMP Negeri 10 Pekanbaru. Axioms, 7(2), 31–37. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/AKS/article/view/2443
Widana, W., & Muliani, P. L. (2020). Analysis Requirements Test Book. In Analysis of Minimum Service Standards in Outpatient Installations at Semarang City Hospital.
Wang, C., & Chiang, F.-K. (2019). Integrating computational thinking into mathematics education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117744345
Wood, T., & Turner-Vorbeck, T. (2001). Extending the discourse: Developing mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(3), 281–297.
Yusuf Sukman, J. (2017). «Эпидемиологическая безопасностьNo Title. Вестник Росздравнадзора, 4, 9–15.
Zetriuslita, Suripah, Dahlia, A., & Rohana, I. (2022). The Validity of Mathematics Learning Tools Based on Realistic Mathematic Education on Two-Variable Linear Equation Materials in Grade VIII Junior High School, Especially Students. Students can learn various fields of science to be able to be model-based, pen. Journal of Scholars: Journal of Mathematics Education, 06(02), 1360–1373.
Zwiers, J., & Crawford, M. (2011). Academic conversations: Classroom talk that fosters critical thinking and content understandings. Stenhouse Publishers.