The Effects of Virtual Algebra Tiles on the Performance of Year 8 Students in Solving Algebraic Linear Equations

Main Article Content

Ms Nurul Hafizah Alias
Associate Professor Dr Masitah Shahrill
Dr Farida Nurhasanah
Associate Professor Dr Mazlini Adnan

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of Virtual Algebra Tiles (VAT) on the performance of 41 Year 8 students in solving algebraic equations. The VAT used in this research is accessible and free through a website called Didax. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from Class 8X (21 students) and Class 8Y (20 students) through convenient sampling in a public secondary school. The Didax VAT was used as an intervention tool to aid students in solving algebraic equations. Quantitative data, in the form of pre-test, post-test, and questionnaire, was administered to the students and analysed to determine the statistical significance of the findings. Qualitative data were used in focus group interviews to explore students’ perceptions of Didax VAT further. The conclusions of this study indicated that the result of the paired sample t-test was not significant, the intervention had a small positive effect on student learning. The qualitative data revealed most students positively perceived using Didax VAT in their learning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alias, N. H., Shahrill, M., Nurhasanah, F., & Adnan, M. (2024). The Effects of Virtual Algebra Tiles on the Performance of Year 8 Students in Solving Algebraic Linear Equations. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i3.1067
Section
Articles

References

Abdul Latiff, E. F., Tengah, K. A., Shahrill, M., Tan, A., & Leong, E. (2017). Using concrete model to enhance conceptual knowledge of low-ability students in factorising quadratic expression. In S. De Silva (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education 2017 (Vol. 3, pp. 166-173). Pitakotte, Sri Lanka: The International Institute of Knowledge Management (TIIKM). https://doi.org/10.17501/icedu.2017.3118

Abdul Latif, N. H., Shahrill, M., & Hidayat, W. (2024). Mastering fractions and innovating with the station rotation model in blended learning. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 501-530. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p501-530

Ahmed, Y., Taha, M. H., Al-Neel, S., & Gaffar, A. M. (2018). Students’ perception of the learning environment and its relation to their study year and performance in Sudan. International Journal of Medical Education, 9, 145-150. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5af0.1fee

Amarasena, S. M. A., & Adnan, M. (2023). Development of bom translasi game as teaching aid on the topic of transformation in mathematics form two. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540(1), 070003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106397

Bouck, E., Mathews, L., & Peltier, C. (2020). Virtual manipulatives: A tool to support access and achievement with middle school students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 51-59. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419882422

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380-400. http://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0031084

Chong, M. S. F., & Shahrill, M. (2016). The use of an emerging framework to explore students’ cognitive competency. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(16). https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/78812

Chong, M. S. F., Shahrill, M., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi (2018). Teaching problem solving using non-routine tasks. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1952(1), 020020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031982

Chong, M. S. F., Shahrill, M., & Li, H-C. (2019). The integration of a problem solving framework for Brunei high school mathematics curriculum in increasing student’s affective competency. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7265.215-228

Durmus, S., & Karakirik, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A theoretical framework. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 117-123. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v5i1/5112.pdf

Efron, S., & Ravid, R. (2013). Action research in education (2nd ed.). Guildford Publications.

Finti, H. N. F. M. M., Shahrill, M., & Salleh, S. M. (2016). Integrating virtual manipulative with the use of iPad in the teaching and learning of fractions. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(4), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2016.08.036

Furner, J. M., & Worrell, N. L. (2017). The importance of using manipulatives in teaching math today. Transformations, 3(1), 1-24. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/transformations/vol3/iss1/2

Garzòn, J., & Bautista, J. (2018). Virtual algebra tiles: A pedagogical tool to teach and learn algebra through geometry. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 876-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12296

Goh, L. S., Tengah, K. A., Shahrill, M., Tan, A., & Leong, E. (2017). Teaching and learning of integers using hands-on versus virtual manipulatives. In S. De Silva (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education 2017 (Vol. 3, pp. 174-185). Pitakotte, Sri Lanka: The International Institute of Knowledge Management (TIIKM). https://doi.org/10.17501/icedu.2017.3119

Ismail, N. F. H., Shahrill, M., & Asamoah, D. (2023). Learning through virtual manipulatives: Investigating the impact of Gizmos-based lessons on students’ performance in integers. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1), ep23009. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12857

Khalid, M., & Embong, Z. (2020). Emphasizing concrete representation to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of operations on Integers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(3), 762-773. http://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.775605

Larbi, E., & Okyere, M. (2014). Algebra tiles manipulative and gender differences in learning and achievement in mathematics: A case of Sunyani West Municipality. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(38), 1-7.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001

Mohd Apandi, N. W., & Adnan, M. (2023). Development of peri-calcup board kit as a form one teaching aids for perimeter topics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540(1), 070004. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106376

Morsidi, N. M. H., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Investigating the use of concrete manipulatives in 3-dimensional problem solving. In C. Vistro-Yu (Ed.), In Pursuit of Quality Mathematics Education for All: Proceedings of the 7th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 467-473). Quezon City: Philippine Council of Mathematics Teacher Educators (MATHTED) Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2140.4646

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39-59. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32552888.pdf

Muhammad, A. H., & Adnan, M. (2023). Chess transformation game as teaching aids in isometric transformation topics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540(1), 070001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106377

Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget’s theory of cognitive development to mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 26-30.

Rini, D. S. (2022). Algebra tiles as physical manipulatives to support students’ understanding of linear equations in one variable. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 12(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v12i2.121

Sahat, N., Tengah, K. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). The teaching and learning of addition and subtraction of integers through manipulative in Brunei Darussalam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012024

Salifu, A. S. (2022). Mathematics tutors’ views on benefits and challenges of using algebra tiles in teaching linear equations in one variable. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 2(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.3845

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2016). Physical and virtual manipulatives: What is “concrete’? In P. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 71-93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_4

Secomb, J., & Smith, C. (2011). A mixed method pilot study: The researchers’ experience. Contemporary Nurse, 39(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2011.39.1.31

Supian, N. A., Adnan, M., & Mohd Khalid, F. A. (2023). Development of smart triankit as teaching aids on the topic of solution of triangles in additional mathematics form 4. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540(1), 070002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106378

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

Teck, W. K. (2013). Promoting conceptual understanding of algebra using virtual manipulatives: A study of form 4 students. Journal Penyelidikan IPG KBL, 11, 1-14.