Roasting Officials in Humorous Discourse by Kiki Saputri: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Main Article Content

Inda Permata Sari
Sulis Triyono

Abstract

This research aims to describe critical discourse analysis, identify classifications based content within discourse of Kiki Saputri official roasting, and the use of implicature official roasting within humorous discourse by Kiki Saputri. This research was qualitative descriptive, data in this research were Kiki Saputri speech and roasting video transcription based on the event of Stand Up in Kompas Tv and Lapor Pak in Trans7. Data collection used listening, taking notes and documentation techniques, data validity used triangulation theory and data triangulation, data analysis used referential match method in interactive model and critical discourse analysis as the data analysis. The results showed the use of hak kekuasaan oleh state officials legitimacy, these state officials were more interested in managing political problems than citizen problems and they were more sensitive about party members’ problems than public problems. In this critical discourse, it was obtained that Kiki, as a comedian, also criticized government related to their work that, according to her, poor government was lack of taking care the poor people, also education problems, citizen needs, and related to social gaps in welfare of poor people which had been not met, yet. Context as a comedian who are the representation of poor people to voice out their feeling toward government who has power through entertaining critical humour.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sari, I. P., & Triyono, S. (2023). Roasting Officials in Humorous Discourse by Kiki Saputri: A Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 2(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i3.657
Section
Articles

References

Anisah, Z. 2016. Polisemi pada wacana humor Indonesia Lawak Klub. AL HIKMAH Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 153-166.

Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Darma, Yoce Aliah. 2014. Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Multiperspektif. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Darmansyah. 2012. Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan Dengan Humor. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Eriyanto. 2006. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta:PT LkiS Pelangi Aksara Yogyakarta.

Harini, et.al.. (2023). Effectiveness of E-Worksheets on Problem-Solving Skills: A Study of Students' Self-Directed Learning in the Topic of Ratios. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (IJMME),1(2), 150-162, https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i02.333.

Ismawati, Esti. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

N Kania, I Nurhikmayati and V Suciawati. (2020). Pre-service mathematics teachers' experiences of teaching practice in function composition. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1613 012013 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012013

Lado, C. R. 2014. Analisis Wacana Kritis Program Mata Najwa “Balada Perda” di Metro TV. Jurnal E-Komunikasi, 2-11.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2004. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana. 2005. Kajian Wacana, Teori, Metode dan Aplikasi Prinsi-prinsip Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Nwachukwu, Emman-uel L. (2023). Negation in Ngor-Okpala Di-alect of Igbo. Journal of Literature Language and Academic Studies (J-LLANS) 2(2), p44-50. https://doi.org/10.56855/jllans.v2i2.638

Nisa’, et. al.(2023).Problem-Based Learning in Improving Problem-Solving Ability and Interest in Learning Mathematics: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (IJMME),1(2), 206-217, https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i3.725.

Rismayani. Item Analysis of Reading Comprehension Test of Wattpad Readers and Writers Com-munity. Journal of Literature Language and Academic Studies (J-LLANS) 1(1), p1-9. https://doi.org/10.56855/10.56855/jllans.v1i01.142

Saraswati, Prasetyo, & Hayu. (2022). The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Learning Discipline ofElementary School Students during the Covid-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of CONTEMPORARY STUDIES Iin EDUCATION, 1(1), 30-36 https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v1i1.116.

Setiawati, Eti, Rusmawati, Roosi. 2019. Analisis Wacana: Konsep, Teori, Dan Aplikasi. Malang: UB Press.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sugiono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2004. Semiotika (Plesetan Pribahasa sebagai Wahana Kritik Sosial). Volume 5 nomor 1. Edisi Januari-Juni. Jember: Jember University Press.

Wulandari, D.A. (2016). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Wacana Humor Abdurrahim Aryad Stand Up Comedy 4 (SUCI 4) di Kompas TV. Tersedia dari Electronical Theses and Dissertations. (URL http://eprints.ums.ac.id/41467/).

Yanti, Ni Putu Dewi Eka, et.al. 2019. Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk Pada Teks Pidato Klaim Kemenangan Pilpres. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 356-362.

Yosep, Rindu Ardilla. 2013. Rekonstruksi Makna Diskriminasi Etnis Tionghoa dalam Buku dari Merem ke Melek: Catatan Seorang Komedian (Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk). Skripsi. Bandung: Universitas Komputer Indonesia Bandung.