Rationalization and Bureaucratization in the Indonesian Education System: An Analysis of Teacher Administrative Burden and Digitalization Complaints on KOMPAS Online Media
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – This study examines the phenomena of rationalization and bureaucratization in the Indonesian education system, focusing on teachers’ administrative burdens and complaints related to educational digitalization. The study is grounded in the growing implementation of efficiency-oriented, technology-driven education policies that aim to simplify bureaucracy but are often perceived by teachers as increasing administrative burdens.
Methodology – A qualitative research design with a document analysis approach was employed. Data were collected from online media reports published by KOMPAS and Kompas.id using purposive sampling to select articles addressing teachers’ administrative workloads, bureaucratic simplification, digital education applications, and policy responses. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, including data reduction, categorization, and thematic interpretation, guided by Max Weber’s concept of the iron cage of bureaucracy.
Findings – Policies emphasizing efficiency, accountability, and administrative modernization paradoxically expanded teachers’ administrative workloads. Digitalization has generated new forms of bureaucracy that demand continuous adaptation, increase work pressure, and shift teachers’ focus from pedagogical practices to documentation and reporting tasks. Consequently, teachers’ professional autonomy is diminished, revealing a misalignment between policy objectives and teachers’ lived experiences.
Novelty – This study contributes original insights by combining media discourse analysis with Weberian bureaucratic theory to reveal the unintended consequences of digitalization on teacher professionalism and identity.
Significance – The study has significant implications for policymakers, school administrators, and education researchers by highlighting the need to reorient policy to prioritize pedagogical quality and teacher autonomy.
Article Details
References
Adawiyah, R., Sirozi, M., & Sumanti, S. T. (2024). Education Bureaucracy in Indonesia and Its Implications for Governance and Quality of Education. Scientific Journal of Counseling Guidance Undiksha, 15(1), 44-51.
Fitzgerald, T. (2009). The Tyranny of Bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(1), 51 65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208098164
Forsyth, C., Irving, M., Short, S., Tennant, M., & Gilroy, J. (2018). Strengthening Indigenous cultural competence in dentistry and oral health education: Academic perspectives. European Journal of Dental Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12398
Klassen, R. & Chiu, M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
Li, L. (2021). Book Review: The State of the System: A Reality Check on Canada’s Schools. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne De L Éducation, 44(3), xxvii-xxx. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.v44i3.5365
Mäkelä, K. and Whipp, P. (2015). Career intentions of Australian physical education teachers. European Physical Education Review, 21(4), 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x15584088
Maria, D., Silpiya, S., & Rijal, M. K. (2018). The Gap in Education Bureaucracy Raises Questions in the Eyes of the Public. Tarbiyah Wa Ta'lim: Journal of Education and Learning Research, 5(1), 36-41.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nyakeko, F., Ngirwa, C., & Malingumu, W. (2023). Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Occupational Stress Causes in Mwanza Region, Tanzania. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 20(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2023/v20i3447
Oliveira, B. and Peixoto, M. (2021). Street-level bureaucracy and public policies: analyzing educational policy implementation from the perspective of schools and teachers. Educação Em
Magazine, 37. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698219212
Rosyada, A., Syahada, P., & Chanifudin, C. (2024). Independent curriculum: The impact of increasing the administrative burden of teachers on learning effectiveness. Journal of Innovation, Evaluation and Development of Learning (JIEPP), 4(2), 238-244.
Sager, F. and Rosser, C. (2021). Weberian Bureaucracy.. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.166
Sertel, G., Karataş, S., & Karadağ, E. (2021). Investigation of the Effectiveness of Management Processes: A Multiple and Holistic Perspective in the Context of Management Approach, Bureaucratic Structure and Cultural Values. Pamukkale University Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1010888
Sugandi, D., & Rodhiyah, R. (2024). The Impact of Digitalization of Education Management on School Administration Efficiency. Journal of Primary Edu, 2(1), 76-91.
Sugiyono. (2021). Qualitative, Quantitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
You, S. and Conley, S. (2014). Workplace predictors of secondary school teachers’ intention to leave. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535741