Exploration of Students' Abilities in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems on Geometry Material Using Polya's Steps

Main Article Content

Tryza Ramalia
Effie Efrida Muchlis
Edi Susanto
Aw Yoke Cheng

Abstract

Students face challenges in understanding the minimum competency assessment (AKM) mathematical literacy questions, as they struggle to interpret and solve the problems effectively. This difficulty stems from their low comprehension of the questions and limited problem-solving skills, particularly when confronted with questions differing from the examples provided by the teacher. This study investigates students’ abilities to solve AKM mathematical literacy questions using Polya’s problem-solving steps. The research is descriptive with a qualitative approach, involving a population of all Grade VIII students at SMP 21 Bengkulu City during the 2023/2024 academic year. The sample consisted of 30 students from class VIII.3 and 30 from class VIII.6. Data collection included test and non-test (interview) methods, utilizing AKM-based test instruments and Polya step-guided problem-solving tasks. Results indicated that 44 students (73.33%) demonstrated low ability, 11 students (18.33%) showed medium ability, and only 5 students (8.33%) exhibited high ability in solving AKM literacy questions. Overall, students’ problem-solving skills were categorized as low, with notable difficulties in planning, executing, and reviewing solutions to mathematical problems.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramalia, T., Effie Efrida Muchlis, Edi Susanto, & Cheng, A. Y. (2024). Exploration of Students’ Abilities in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems on Geometry Material Using Polya’s Steps. International Journal of Geometry Research and Inventions in Education, 1(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.56855/gradient.v1i2.1269
Section
Articles

References

Arifin, Z. (2016). Penelitian Pendidikan, Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arifin, Z., & Bonyah, E. (2024). Tracing the Roots of Error: A Polya Method Analysis on Student Problem Solving in Curved Surface Solids. International Journal of Geometry Research and Inventions in Education (Gradient), 1(01), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.56855/gradient.v1i01.1144

Arif, M. (2022). SAINS MELALUI PENDEKATAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS SD/MI. 04(01), 123–148.

Astuti, P. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. 1, 263–268.

Daryanto dan Raharjo, M. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Gava Media.

Febindayanti, A., Sinaga, B., Info, A., Konsep, P., & Siswa, K. (2024). Analisis pemahaman konsep matematika siswa dalam penerapan pembelajaran berbasis konstruktivisme. 8(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijel.v8i1.2073

Hendi, A., Caswita, C., & Haenilah, E. Y. (2020). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Strategi Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.310

Indrawati, F. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Farah. 1(1), 382–386.

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. PT. Refika Aditama.

Mawardi, K., Arjudin, A., Turmuzi, M., & Azmi, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika pada Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau dari Tahapan Polya. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(4), 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v2i4.260

Nopriana, T., Firmasari, S., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). Profile of Hard skills and Soft skills of Mathematics Education Students. EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching‏‏‎, 10(1), 1-13.

Salsabilla, I., & Hidayati, Y. M. (2021). KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA TIPE HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS ). 6.

Silitonga, R. K. (2021). Analisis Alih Kode dan Campur Kode pada Novel Mariposa karya Luluk HF. Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 5(3), 174.

Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistik. Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2011). metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitataif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods)tle. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian manajemen. Alfabeta Bandung.

Susanta, A., Susanto, E., & Rusdi. (2020). Efektivitas project based learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan berpikir kritis mahasiswa [The effectiveness of project based learning in term of the students’ abilities problem solving and critical thinking]. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 5(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v5i1.2219