Empowering Students with Discovery Learning in Circle Geometry for Better Problem-Solving
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of discovery-based teaching aids that use circular material is to assist young individuals in improving their mathematics skills. The ADDIE technique, which encompasses analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation, is considered during development. The objective of analysis is to ascertain the specific knowledge and skills that students desire to acquire and the most effective methods for instructing them. Learning about the circle and the components that make it up and then applying that knowledge to the problem-solving process is one of the goals. Learning approaches focused on exploration are established during the project's design phase. In order to facilitate learning about the circular notion, visual aids and environments are currently being developed—the development process results in the production of learning modules, student workbooks, and interactive instructional materials. The designs are what determine the final result. The implementation process entails analysing learning, interactions between students, and the materials used in the classroom. Every effective method of evaluation incorporates the results of student learning as well as input from both the instructor and the students. This strategy aims to discover problems with the quality of the course content. According to the findings of several studies, students who participate in discovery-based training demonstrate improvements in their understanding of circles and their ability to solve mathematical problems on their own. Involving kids in the learning process makes it more exciting and enjoyable.
Article Details
References
Angraini, L. M., Larsari, V. N., Muhammad, I., & Kania, N. (2023). Generalizations and analogical reasoning of junior high school viewed from bruner’s learning theory. 12(2), 291–306.
Ballard, S. L., & Dymond, S. K. (2023). Beliefs About Secondary-Age Students with Extensive Support Needs Participating in Their Health Care at School. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 48(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969231173932
Bauyot, M. M. (2024). Developing an ADDU Online Pedagogical Framework. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(4s), 1448–1457. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2188
Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of cooperative learning supported by reflective thinking activities on students’ critical thinking skills . Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(80), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.5
Hadi, S., & Radiyatul, R. (2014). Metode Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Polya untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v2i1.603
Kamid, Ramalisa, Y., Fajriah, N., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., Rivani, P. A., Widodo, R. I., & Ningsih, I. W. (2023). Collaborative Character, Cognitive Psychology, and Process Skills: The Impact of Character-Based Mathematics Learning in High Grades of Elementary Schools. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.55095
Kania, N., Fitriani, C., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Prior Knowledge Mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 2(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i1.248
Kania, N., & Juandi, D. (2023). Does self-concept affect mathematics learning achievement ? 17(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20554
Kania, N., Sudianto, S., & Hanipah, H. (2022). Analysis of Student’s Geometry Thinking Ability Based on Van Hiele’s Theory. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v12i1.62273
Lawe, Y. U., Noge, Desidaria, M., & Rato, Kristoforus Portasius Dosi Novaliendry, D. (2021). Creation Of Multilingual Teaching Materials Focused On Content And Background Of Ngada Culture For Primary 1st Grade. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(2), 3110–3118. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i2.2355
Ling, G., Elliot, N., Burstein, J. C., McCaffrey, D. F., MacArthur, C. A., & Holtzman, S. (2021). Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance. Assessing Writing, 48(July 2020), 100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100509
Masuku, M. M., Jili, N. N., & Sabela, P. T. (2020). Assessment as A Pedagogy and Measuring Tool in Promoting Deep Learning In Institutions of Higher Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 274. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p274
Mudaly, V. (2021). Constructing mental diagrams during problem-solving in mathematics. Pythagoras, 42(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V42I1.633
Nurlaelah, A., Ilyas, M., & Nurdin. (2021). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SD. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v4i2.1367
Putri, V. M., & Amini, R. (2023). Integrated Thematic E-LKPD with RADEC- Based Neapod in Grade V Elementary School. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.61224
Rahman, N. A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A. S., & Halim, L. (2021). Mathematics teachers’ practices of stem education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1541–1559. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.3.1541
Ratnawulan, N., & Kania, N. (2020). Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model Numbered Head Together ( Nht ) Type To Improve Learning Activities. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 4(2), 161–168.
Schall, G., Mendez, E., Kruijff, E., Veas, E., & ... (2009). Handheld augmented reality for underground infrastructure visualization. Personal and Ubiquitous …. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00779-008-0204-5.pdf
Situmorang, D. F., Siahaan, T. M., & Tambunan, L. O. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Treffinger Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 2(02), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v2i02.1793
Sönmez, N., & Alptekin, S. (2020). Teaching a Student with Poor Performance in Mathematics to Recall of Multiplication Facts Using Simultaneous Prompting with Systematic Review and Corrective Feedback. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p33
Sumarni, S., Adiastuty, N., Riyad, M., Fisabqi, N., & Pritiya, W. (2022). Development of Geometry Teaching Materials Assisted Geogebra Android to Improve Mathematical Connection Ability. Proceedings of the 2nd Universitas Kuningan International Conference on System, Engineering, and Technology, UNISET 2021, 2 December 2021, Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-12-2021.2320201
Susilo, F. J., Usodo, B., & Sari, D. (2023). The Profile of High-order Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56855//ijmme.v1i1.266
Uegatani, Y., Nakawa, N., & Kosaka, M. (2021). Changes to Tenth-Grade Japanese Students’ Identities in Mathematics Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(2), em0638. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10905
Wahyudi, W., Waluya, S. ., Suyitno, W., & Isnarto, I. (2020). The impact of 3CM model within blended learning to students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.588
Z, R., Nuraina, N., & Novia, N. (2022). PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS DAN MINAT BELAJAR. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Malikussaleh, 2(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.29103/jpmm.v2i2.9268