Medical Record Digitization Policy: Overview of the Health Minister Regulation Number 24 of 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical Records, which regulates electronic medical records.
Methods: This research is juridical research with a statutory approach. Thus, this study only analyzes the rules and regulations related to legal or policy issues related to the digitization of medical records.
Results: The obligation of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in Indonesia has legal certainty with the ratification of the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical Records. This obligation has administrative consequences in the form of a written warning and/or recommendations for revocation or revocation of accreditation status for Health Service Facilities that commit violations. The provisions of this policy must go into effect no later than December 31, 2023.
Conclusion: Three new things are regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022: the electronic system of electronic medical records, activities for organizing electronic medical records, security, and protection of electronic medical record data.
Article Details
References
Madjido M, Espressivo A, Maula AW, Fuad A, Hasanbasri M. Health Information System Research Situation in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019;161:781-787. doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2019.11.183
Mijin N, Jang H, Choi B, Khongorzul G. Attitude toward the use of electronic medical record systems: Exploring moderating effects of self-image. Inf Dev. 2019;35(1):67-79. doi:10.1177/0266666917729730/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0266666917729730-FIG1.JPEG
Ismawati NDS, Supriyanto S, Haksama S, Hadi C. The influence of knowledge and perceptions of doctors on the quality of medical records. J Public health Res. 2021;10(2):2228. doi:10.4081/JPHR.2021.2228
Harahap NC, Handayani PW, Hidayanto AN. Barriers and facilitators of personal health record adoption in Indonesia: Health facilities’ perspectives. Int J Med Inform. 2022;162:104750. doi:10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2022.104750
Bhyat R, Gibson C, Hayward R, et al. Implementing Informatics Competencies in Undergraduate Medical Education: A National-Level “Train the Trainer” Initiative. Heal Prof Educ Age Clin Inf Syst Mob Comput Soc Networks. Published online January 1, 2017:347-370. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805362-1.00017-6
Gray DF. Electronic Medical Record Considerations. In: Visser LS, Montejano AS, eds. Fast Facts for the Triage Nurse. Second Edi. Springer Publishing Company; 2018. doi:10.1891/9780826148513.0013
Marpaung Y, Taifur WD, Syah NA, Yusuf Y. Application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Managing Medical Records for Accuracy of INA-CBGs Health Insurance Claims in a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia. Perspect Heal Inf Manag. 2022;19(3).
Manoppo IA, Tutik R, Hariyati S. Usefulness of Electronic Medical Records Technology for Nurse Managers: A Literature Review. Str J Ilm Kesehat. 2021;10(2):1509-1517. doi:10.30994/SJIK.V10I2.856
Rizki F, Noor NB, Adellia UAM, Irwandy. Analysis of Standard Operational Procedures implementation on medical records completion at Stella Maris Hospital in Makassar, Indonesia. Enfermería Clínica. 2020;30:35-39. doi:10.1016/J.ENFCLI.2019.07.023
Babbott S, Manwell LB, Brown R, et al. Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: Results from the MEMO Study. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2014;21(E2):e100-e106. doi:10.1136/AMIAJNL-2013-001875/3/AMIAJNL2013001875F02.JPEG
Liu J, Luo L, Zhang R, Huang T. Patient satisfaction with electronic medical/health record: a systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(4):785-791. doi:10.1111/SCS.12015
Paré G, Raymond L, de Guinea AO, et al. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(8):548-558. doi:10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2014.06.003
Fritz F, Tilahun B, Dugas M. Success criteria for electronic medical record implementations in low-resource settings: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(2):479-488. doi:10.1093/JAMIA/OCU038
Aguirre RR, Suarez O, Fuentes M, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA. Electronic Health Record Implementation: A Review of Resources and Tools. Cureus. 2019;11(9). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.5649
Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(11):779-796. doi:10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2014.06.011
Sher ML, Talley PC, Yang CW, Kuo KM. Compliance With Electronic Medical Records Privacy Policy: An Empirical Investigation of Hospital Information Technology Staff. Inq A J Med Care Organ Provis Financ. 2017;54. doi:10.1177/0046958017711759
Sharma S, Munshi A, Sharma V. Time to Educate Physicians and Hospital Staff in Electronic Medical Records for Precision Medicine. Prog Challenges Precis Med. Published online January 1, 2017:217-232. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809411-2.00012-X
Andrianto W. Catatan Sederhana untuk Permenkes No. 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis. Published 2022. Accessed February 26, 2023. https://law.ui.ac.id/catatan-sederhana-untuk-permenkes-no-24-tahun-2022-tentang-rekam-medis-oleh-wahyu-andrianto-s-h-m-h/
Alkureishi ML, Lee WW, Frankel RM. Patient-Centered Technology Use: Best Practices and Curricular Strategies. Heal Prof Educ Age Clin Inf Syst Mob Comput Soc Networks. Published online January 1, 2017:201-232. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805362-1.00010-3
Keshta I, Odeh A. Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egypt Informatics J. 2021;22(2):177-183. doi:10.1016/J.EIJ.2020.07.003